American wars distort semantics
This entry was posted on 7/14/2007 12:42 PM and is filed under uncategorized.
You've noticed it - there is a lot of fuss about the Iraq War. Like
Bryan Adams singing, "I feel it in my fingers; I feel it in my
toes...," it seems as if the present defeatist tone can be felt
everywhere.
If people believed "The Daily Show" as an accurate policy-feeling think
tank, the likelihood of any victorious strategy left for Iraq would be
less than Newt Gingrich's chances of becoming president.
But the truth is, at this point nobody can really tell what's going to
happen in the next five years. Serious historical judgments need more
time, and that's exactly what we don't have yet - time to evaluate the
outcome of this war.
What we do have is plenty of time to evaluate the ongoing jargon this war has already honored us with.
We've learned that bombs don't kill soldiers - IEDs, or Improvised
Explosive Devices, now do the job. The old-fashioned concept of "civil
war" has also been demoted as the Bush administration tells us, "Iraq
doesn't have civil wars. It has sectarian violence." And what is it
called when the United States invades other countries? Those are
preemptive attacks, of course. Everybody knows Iraq was going to attack
the United States.
Compare this with the jargon the Vietnam War left us 40 years ago.
Past generations learned that innocent deaths were called "collateral
damage" and assassination attempts were "removals with extreme
prejudice." When bombs hit schools or hospitals by mistake it was
called "incontinent ordnance." Accurate, right?
But the more recent "weapons of mass destruction" tops them all.
I can imagine a future in which cunning politicians use the WMD acronym
to devastate new waves of paranoid American politics. Think about the
50th president cajoling Americans by saying something like, "We need to
preemptively attack Fiji because their fishing abuse is threatening the
global markets of crab meat." Later, the pol of turn will say something
like, "The presidential scare is another episode of WMDs," and the
public will remember instantaneously what WMD implies.
Or maybe they will just shout "To the hell with Fiji," and another chapter in American semantics will begin.
David Soler is a biomedical sciences graduate and a columnist for the Summer Kent Stater.
Contact him at dsoler@kent.edu.